Manila
SECOND DIVISION
G.R. No. L-52153 & L-52154 November 17, 1980
KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES, petitioner-appellant,
vs.
COURT OF APPEALS, VENANCIO DUARTE and LUZ SILVA-DUARTE, respondents-appellees.
G.R. No. L-52154 November 17, 1980
KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES, petitioner-appellant,
vs.
COURT OF APPEALS, MODESTO FLORES and MARIA M. QUILINO FLORES, respondents-appellees.
AQUINO, J.:
On October 16, 1980, the parties, assisted by their lawyers, filed the following:
"MOTION FOR COMPROMISE JUDGMENT
"COME NOW the private parties, assisted by their respective attorneys, and to this Honorable Court respectfully state that:
"1. They have just reached an amicable settlement of their differences in this case.
"2. The petitioner KLM Royal Dutch Airlines has agreed to pay to the Flores spouses in G. R. No. L-52154 the sum of P425,000.00 and to the Duarte spouses in G.R. No. L-52153 the sum of P353,677.74 broken down as follows:
| P350,000.00 |
| 3,515.40 | (US $465.00) |
| 162.34 | (FR 90.00) |
P353,677.74
|
"3. For and in consideration of the foregoing agreement, the parties hereto hereby release and discharge each other from any and all claims arising out of the causes of action sued upon in the above-entitled cases.
"WHEREFORE, it is respectfully prayed that judgment be rendered in accordance with the foregoing compromise agreement, without costs.
" Makati for Manila, Metro Manila, October 9, 1980.
| Assisted by: |
"KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES
Petitioner BY |
REYES, SANTAYANA,
TAYAO & PICAZO By: |
(Sgd) P.E. Heeswyck
P. E. van HEESWYCK
General Manager Philippines |
(SGD.) Rafael S. Santayana
(Typed) RAFAEL S. SANTAYA
Counsel for the Petitioner
3rd Floor, Zaragoza Building, Gamboa cor. Trasierra Street
Makati, Metro Manila
— jde — |
VENANCIO DUARTE, ET AL.,
Respondents |
MODESTO FLORES, ET AL.
Respondents |
| By (SGD.) (ILLEGIBLE) |
By (SGD.) (ILLEGIBLE) |
Assisted By:
FLORES, OCAMPO, DIZON & DOMINGO
By: (SGD.) Emiliano M Ocampo
(Typed) EMILIANO M. OCAMPO
Attorneys for the Respondents
Suite 1901. Pacific Bank Bldg.
Ayala Ave., Makati, Metro Manila
The motion is granted. The compromise agreement is approved. Judgment is hereby rendered in accordance therewith. The parties are enjoined to comply with the terms of the said agreement.ℒαwρhi৷ No. costs.
SO ORDERED.
Barredo (Chairman), Concepcion, Jr., Abad Santos and De Castro, JJ., concur.
The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation
